The Quantum World

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Randomness in the Social Quantum Reality is Non Existent!

Randomness lacks symmetry; periodicity, evidence of design or order of any kind... when we look at a society we see complexity, a highly complex interdependence and what we don't' see is randomness.

If the human brain is wired a certain way, why would randomness be an outcome of its processing? It would not. How did the idea of randomness get in there? Like a computer hard drive at risk from a hack, corrupt information can get in. It maybe that memories are not localized, not even stored in the brain and hence 'wires get crossed' in the cloud. Karl Pribram's claim that memory is not localized  is supported by the idea of imagination, social imagination.  

As we can read, Karl Pribram's holonomic model of brain processing is described in his 1991 "Brain and Perception", which contains the extension of his work with David Bohm. It states that, in addition to the circuitry accomplished by the large fiber tracts in the brain, processing also occurs in webs of fine fiber branches (for instance, dendrites) that form webs, as well as in the dynamic electrical fields that surround these dendritic "trees". In addition, the processing occurring around these dendritic trees can influence that occurring in those trees of nearby neurons whose dendrites are entangled but not in direct contact. In this way, processing in the brain can occur in a non-localized manner.

If such dendritic trees behaved randomly then there would be no point to influence any other trees nearby as randomness has nothing to do with the transference of information... because there is no information to transfer; if we are talking about random 'information' ... that's just gobbly guck as in non- sense. So what is the point to share gobbly guck? My point exactly. 

Social imagination can seem random in its process but it is not. It may appear that way to a single person 'man' who is not operating as a super imagination but a mere contributor. From our individual perspective, we just don't have the big picture - the bird's eye view of the program. 

When someone does something here, someone over there is affected in the social imagination not because of randomness but because of purpose and meaning. There is no disconnectedness and no randomness to man's social imagination. 

Werner Gitt, information scientist, director and professor at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology, German, knows that all information has a source. Our universe contains digitized information, including our DNA. Gitt posits that its impossible that we are here due to arbitrary events.  

Gitt accepts a six day creation because God - the Creator and super source of all information can upload incredible amounts of information in one day (morning - boker to evening - erev) and for us it seems like it has taken millions or billions of years

Chuck Missler, engineer in aerospace in computer science, informs us, as Gitt posits, that a day is perceived differently in this digitized realm... of the 'social quanutm; especially, when we are talking about amounts of information. How much information comes at an individual daily is huge and almost impossible to imagine dealing with especially if we were to be told each morning just how much we would have to download

A day, in Missler's research, is referred to as boker and erev or becoming vs. obscurity. It is about order and disorder (information and lack of). As a day passes from the erev 'disorder' to the boker 'order', information fills the space. Each of these 'frames' (day/evening-tonight) of uploads, brings more and more information to light. 

We live in a collective conscious of information (coming into our brains in the form of light particles) and those particles of light are governed by an even greater conscious! In Him, we live, move and have our Being! ~ Acts 17:28.  

*additional source - Pribram, Karl (1991). Brain and perception: holonomy and structure in figural processing. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Evolution ~ Bucked by the Holographic Nature of the Universe!

While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18.

The holographic nature of the universe can be understood by David Bohm's Model: Explicate (enfolded) Order; tangible everyday physical reality, Implicate (unfolded) Order: more primary deeper, underlying reality.

Bohm used the idea of the implicate order, the deeper and non-local level of existence from which our entire universe springs, to echo this sentiment - every action starts from an intention in the implicate order. The imagination is already the creation of the form; it already has the intention and the germs of all the movements needed to carry it out.

The brain is a hologram enfolded in a holographic universe. We can view ourselves as physical bodies moving through space. Or we can view ourselves as a blur of interference patterns enfolded throughout the cosmic hologram. This could be also expressed with the analogy that the brain is like the laser beam that shines through the holographic film to interpret the patterns.

As it turns out, you can preserve the interference patterns of more than one hologram on the same film by using various different angles of projection of the laser beams. Therefore, depending on the direction and frequency of the beam that you send through the film, a different hologram will appear. So, if applied to the brain, consciousness literally becomes the co-creator of the reality portrayed depending upon its angle of perception.

This does not mean that if I am looking at a tree, it is not really there.

The tree is there on multidimensional levels, which means that I am seeing a cross-section of the tree depending on the level of consciousness that I am tuned into. If the brain is a decoder of sorts, then it can be tuned to different states or frequencies of consciousness, and I will see different levels of tree reality depending upon which one I’m on.

Therefore, mind contributes to the phenomenon of reality itself, not just to the knowledge of it. In a brain that operates holographically, the remembered image of a thing can have as much impact on the senses as the thing itself.

Think about how we see the universe starting with how light particles enter the eye which is just a mechanism for taking in information coming into the eye on particles of light. That information is made useable via electro-chemical processes which the brain further processes sending it on to the mind which understands that information only because of what we call - meaning.  This is how the mind contributes to the phenomenon of social reality.

Where would evolution fit into this? Of course, those who are of that 'mindset' will tell you its the process and as the process develops becoming more complex we evolve. But, they leave out 'meaning'. What is the point? They will jump up and down screaming, "don't you get it man". Meaning comes when we evolve. I say that is not true.

Meaning has to come first or we would not evolve which would necessarily have the goal to acquire greater meaning. Even a hint of meaning (which is already complex in its abstract form) has to come first in order that we seek what it means to even be alive and how it all began. Meaning is everything in social reality. Without meaning, we would not even have this discussion.

~ Source : http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_holouniverse04.htm

Thursday, February 2, 2017

So, it seems we live in a Digital Simulation having a Holographic Nature....

Well, it makes more sense than thinking first there was nothing and then it exploded as Dr. Chuck Missler commented...

Theoretical physicists have uncovered evidence that the universe is probably a giant holographic illusion. Actually, its more probable that we live in a digital simulation that has holographic nature. It appears that we experience reality in Planck lengths, quanta packets of light that enter the eye. The brain receives and reads the 'packets of information' and the mind interprets it.  

In that case, how are things perceived to be solid? In a digital simulation, the perception follows the rules put in motion/set in place for the program. This is not as abstract as you might think or could imagine. The holographic universe theory states that humans perceive reality as three dimensional, but it is in fact a mere projection on a two dimension surface... an illusion.  How do they know this? Good question. 

Having new telescopes, scientists have been able to observe the 'afterglow' of what they called left over from the big bang or when the hologram was launched. Because of quantum field theories we know that quantum packets of information are what make up the universe and all 'reality'. We experience them bit by bit... and who is sending those packets of information?  

What they look at ... the afterglow is the basic and or smallest pixels they can observe and they know that in quantum physics those packets of information can be cut in half and the next half cut in half until they get to a point of non-locality or where everything is located at the source of its projection. And, that projection comes from somewhere not nowhere. 

Was there nothing and then it exploded? If the hologram had a beginning, it was there in the mind of the Creator. For, no thing or man could ever imagine something before it was created.

*He was before all things and in Him all things hold together by the power of His Word ~ COL 1:17, Hebrews 1:3. 

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Social Reality in a Closed System!

Yes, a closed system. Oh, you say that we live in an open system. No, we don't. In a closed system, there is only so much information that can be accessed and measured and known as existing as it has measurable definition. Even if new information were to 'come in' it is now within a closed system because someone has recognized it as 'new' to this system. In an open system, no one would be able to determine if something was new or old. And, you know that a 'scientist' can only measure the speed of light in a closed system. And, that applies to anything we want to measure; its only measurable in a closed system which has given boundaries, set perimeters and definition that can be measured. I have to smile at some people who call themselves 'scientists'. 

One such scientist exists at MIT thinks that there are random clumps of dirt on the earth. "You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant,” said he. I would like to know how he defines 'random' atoms and why he assumes they are random and what defines it as random in a closed system. I will answer for him. He thinks that because he chose a clump of atoms / dirt from any other, its random. That's pretty arrogant and presumptuous. In fact, he is denying non-locality. Because in quantum physics, his atom choice is made and it is the same in another place in this closed system. If something were truly random, it would have to exist in an open system and guess what; we would not be able to recognize it one from another because in an open system nothing has true definition. But, we live in a closed system of particular information. 

Again, you / he may argue and ask me to explain how is that new information comes in. I would say 'new information' does not come in but if it does, its only possible because we are in a closed system. Yes, you/ he could only recognize it as new because you/he knows what is old, what is defined. Anyway, what if a random clump of dirt exists in a closed system? It is not without given properties even if it is random and having given 'random' properties, it / they are in fact complex. England writes papers and teaches at MIT that 'his' random clump of dirt is without anything and from 'his' nothing comes life. And, I am still smiling ~

Life is not equal to matter + energy -------------------- > Life equals matter + energy + information! I am sure you would agree that information to be recognized as 'useful' information has a source and such a source is not without definition or it would be no source!

The problem for most 'scientists' is accepting that we cannot know such a source in its nature nor its entirety from this closed system. And, why did I say 'useful'? Because, information that is not useful would not be recognized. And, that information comes from something/someone. The Creator of the program and His information is coming to us through quanta - packets of light. In enters the eye, the brain receives it, the mind either embraces it or rejects it.