However,
we can and do experience abstract concepts such as freedom, love and
justice; though rather they are a 'state of mind' experiences than they
are physical as in tangible sensory experiences; but nonetheless, a
sensory experience of another kind and one than cannot be seen.
If we view social reality as an information reality and we should because there isn't any other reality; we can then say
that nothing comes into our 'social' information
reality (living in our mind as the social imagination) unless there is
an absolute source for it and agreement that it did enter/is
experienced. The
fact that we can agree on anything as information that entered in as a
truth especially as an 'the' absolute truth is truly
supernatural; existing outside of our social imagination and perhaps of
another information reality of a higher entity in a higher dimension.
In terms of agreement reality and the social imagination, what matters is what
compels us to understand that which enters in... Yes, that is what matters most - what compels. Einstein said there is no such as
nothing or 'no' thing.
Hence, things, understood as 'information', cannot come
into our social reality (social imagination) unless there is a source for such
things 'information' that allows true information to enter in and or delivers
information and in that we agree that it did enter in. The fact
that we can agree on anything as a truth especially an 'the' absolute truth is truly
supernatural.
Man
exists in the locus of his/her mind and in that there must be agreement
reality orchestrated in his/her social imagination. There is no social
reality
in the social imagination without agreement in/of it. Let me say like
this, we exist in agreement
reality via the social imagination, wherein we
find/have a medium for agreement.
Now,
there a lot of groups/nations that agree on
this or that as their truth. And, for each in their place of being in
the social imagination experience a truth. Ones' truth is always a truth
as long as there is agreement. In fact, you cannot
be human unless you experience truth through agreement reality in the
social imagination at least on some level about
something... I think therefore I am and the sun is a star! But, is any agreement reality built on an 'the' absolute truth?
Does
it matter that all man/people agree on the same things or just some
things and disagree on some things or everything? That's a good
question. What matters is what compels them to agree and what they end
up agreeing on. But, in agreement comes also the idea (or doubt) of
whether or not that which was agreed upon was not just true in a place but whether or not it the absolute truth - true for all things in all time.
Soren
Kierkegaard said that there is no absolute truth in the masses of mere
men because real
absolute truth exists only in the One created it. As with the game of
telephone, who started the information chain holds the absolute truth of
it and it weakens as it passing on down the line.
For
those who are committed to the absolute truth, they are often open
receivers
of it. And, though we can agree that man is a social imagination, a
social composite of many, if there were no absolute source to begin with
for his/her social imagination, there would be no real truth to his/her
social reality. For there cannot be absolutely true information agreed
on without an absolutely true source for it. Only the true source can
reveal the truth of it. Only the Creator of true information can share
true information as true.
Can
there be false information and agreed upon false truths? Yes, it
happens because man exists in agreement reality. he was designed to
agree and has no reality without it. We live in a social information
reality; one in which we must agree on the truth of it. Created from by
an absolute source and created to agree on that. To exist, we must be in
agreement. So, when in doubt entered in, we agreed anyway. We were
compelled to agree and perhaps out of being compelled to agree not just
on any information but the absolute truth of it, we agreed on something
that was not.
Information
reality is our reality and we are compelled to agree for that is our
existence. To agree is the truth of who we are. Being so compelled
allowed error/doubt to enter in and we were compelled to agree on
something even false information. Agreeing to agree always causes
problems. Just as it does in the game of telephone. It
happened at the fall. Man doubted the truth and its true source and
then in a fear of not being real had to
agree so Eve agreed and Adam agreed with Eve and a false information was
agreed upon. Its seems we have been looping ever since. The reboot is
coming!
2 Corinthians 6:16-17 ~ "And what agreement has the temple of God with idols" [false gods/false information]? None! For we/"you are the temple
of the living God". As God has said, “I will dwell in them and walk among them.
I will be their/your God, And they/you shall be My people.” Therefore, “Come out from among
them and be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch"/use/spread "what is unclean" 'information', "And I will
receive you.”
When we consider the traffic of information in quantum computing, which also requires agreement reality, we should understand that each quantum computer must be unto itself an island of perfect information in the sense that it agrees with the information it has from the beginning to end and never doubts it as real and true (or at least think that within its actual closed system) and it could never come into contact with information that is other than what it considers real and true. If it did, the flow of information traffic would be stopped ... dead in its tracks.
ReplyDelete