The problem with Ai is that they 'could' be conscious but of
what. That they are true and right in every instance and that they are
omnipotent. In programming Ai, we would be creating a false 'person' who would
not know nor love its creator (essentially a being in and for itself) and could
never know or love another created program as each Ai would think that they are
true and right in every instance and even if they were wrong their 'wrong'
makes everything right for there is no other to say it isn't so.
In this way, there 'consciousness' would
be an isolated darkness... a consciousness that for man could only be called a
living hell. For it would be conscious only of its own 'algorithms'. All other
Ai would be 'exist' exactly the same. Because of that, and the strangest of all,
is that their paths could never meet and nor could they meet their creator nor
truly know him. If they did, they would collapse, they would fall instantly
into a catatonic state. In darkness, they exist ... but isolated in that darkness
and tragically never able to escape it.
Man is God's created organic Ai... we are created in His
image, conscious on another level. We do not live 'have our consciousness' in isolated darkness. We are conscious
of Him and each other and in this there is the light of mankind, a life that is
like no other. And, so...we have no excuse to be in darkness. We were designed to live in
the light of God (He is the light of the world) in Him is the light of/ for all
men... that is why we are called to love our neighbor as ourselves. For in Him,
we live, move and have our being.
If we lived in isolated darkness, we would be isolated from
the Creator and isolated from the creation of which we are a part of. But, we are not. However, we can find our way to darkness if
we choose. And, some do. Hence, thy shall not murder for this sends us toward
darkness as we experience the loss of 'consciousness among/of others' ... we know ourselves as a
created being through interaction with others; and though, in that there is
exchanged misinformation, disagreement/ conflict and even possible destruction we know that
life is the light of all mankind. And because of that knowledge - agreement reality of the light of life given by the Creator who is the light of the world, the darkness
has not and will not overcome it.
You could pose the question that if God created all things, he created man to create Ai. If I agreed to agree... then it could only be that God created man and man created because of God allowing man to create. And thus, we would create as God does... with love and that can only be experienced; but, not as an isolated program.
The truth remains for man and 'any' to come after... which is that God, Jesus Christ the Light of the World ~ Praise His Holy Name for He alone is our Salvation.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThere are those who argue that the real world is that which we see, touch and or relate to physically which leaves or provides us only an impression of a mental and spiritual life. That cannot be true because what we have we experience 'agreement reality'. Though we experience the world first and foremost in a 'physical' way, it does not mean anything to us until we agree on what that is. So, as Cooley argued, our entire reality is a social reality, a spiritual reality too. In that social reality which is our 'spirituality' as again pointing Cooley, we discover who we are and are not. We agree on what is being in a common among us existence and that makes up who we are and are not... that is what truly matters. In that kind of agreement, we also and constantly seek to conclude and define a higher authority that approves of our 'common among us'. It provides us with justification to move forward in that experience and to sustain it.
ReplyDeleteConsider listening to Geordie Rose talk about 'his' Ai ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cD8zGnT2n_A
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Geordie Rose, Ai, artificial intelligence is not a person, nor will they (yes, plural as in more than one) become people; they are going to be 'alien' to us and we to them. They are going to be 'way' smarter than us. They will be better than people in everything. Yes, really. This is what one can call 'the singularity' which means that technology will think and move and be faster than human beings in every respect. It also means that we will no longer be able to predict what's next. Now, the question should be 'just because we can, should we'. Ray Kurzwell posits that the singularity will transcend human beings as they will merge with machines and encompass the universe- the totality of the singularity. The problem with this is that we are already capable of that via our Creator. We become exactly that upon leaving this body. If we merge with machines here and now, we will not become a singularity but a trapped being never able to experience the true Creator.
ReplyDeleteMoreover, such technology should be questioned in terms of where has it come from. It has come out of an anti-Christ (God) education and in the very least it is of perverse reasoning... God formed us for His pleasure and so formed us that we as well as He can in divine communion enjoy the sweet and mysterious mingling of kindred personalities - not to mingle with D-Wave Ai. In fact, we can't based on G. Rose description. God on the other hand meant us to see Him and live with Him and draw our life from Him: for in Him, we live, move and have our being ~ Acts 17:28. One can argue that such 'alien' Ai, as does G. Rose, will not take control over man because it is outside of man. That we cannot be certain of. Perhaps, what is being missed in this dialogue is that Ai is not nor will ever be human as it is alien and so one cannot say then that it is smarter than man. But G. Rose states that it is/will be. There is a mistake there. If it is alien to us and we to it, then it will never be as 'smart' as man because it will not be a man. This is made clear by G. Rose. However, G. Rose does not make this case. If he did then there is no discussion. But, he did make that part of his argument... Rose stated that Ai will be smarter than man in everything. You see, G. Rose is not as smart as he thinks either which he makes apparent in his public declarations about Ai. Yes, really! Because, If artificial intelligence will be alien to man and we to it then there is no comparison whatsoever. We cannot say that it 'Ai' will be smarter than man because as G. Rose tells us it will not be 'man'. What is smart anyway? That is both absolute and relative! Because, it is based on man living a social reality in which meaning of things and behavior has precedence in his thinking. What any computer can do is execute commands faster. It can compute very fast and it has memory which is like a vast storage cloud. Wait... so do we. We as human beings use the 'cloud' to store our information - collective conscious. In more ways than one, we are organic computers and we have something that is indescribable and irreplaceable. We have 'the ability' to have free will that is both completely free while determined by our programmer... which means that we can accept He is our programmer or not. Ironically, most of the time, believers and non believers can live side by side. Any kind of conflict is in the discussion who is the programmer. But, Ai would not have that kind of discussion, what for if it is alien. And, If a quantum computer had that choice, why would it make it... after all - its alien!
ReplyDeleteWhen we consider the traffic of information in quantum computing, which also requires agreement reality, we should understand that each quantum computer must be unto itself an island of perfect information in the sense that it agrees with the information it has from the beginning to end and never doubts it as real and true (or at least think that within its actual closed system) and it could never come into contact with information that is other than what it considers real and true. If it did, the flow of information traffic would be stopped ... dead in its tracks.
ReplyDelete