Information Reality ~ Is Our Reality outside of a Higher Dimension?

Sociologists like myself have for some time considered social reality to be nothing more than the experience of information reality. Charles H. Cooley many many years ago viewed social reality as that which takes place in the mind ~ the locus of reality. Essentially, a dialogue of personal ideas among us....which means that we can only imagine who we are based on the feedback we bounce off each other. May we say the same about others including those from or in other dimensions or in outer space? Is that what CERN is trying to determine and or HARP? The interesting thing is that scientists ('educated' men by other 'educated' men - and whose education is it anyway???) don't consider that what we think is 'alien' is just another aspect of our information reality as being a lower dimension outside of a higher dimension. 

Perhaps, they have realized this and thus seek to discover the source of that information (higher dimension) which is likely the case.  In my opinion, science ignores this essential aspect of reality which is the only reality we know. Many would and do question if this is actually the case. Which is good but again they fail to understand that everything we accept as real is just what we choose to recognize in the flow of information.

What is CERN doing? Aren't they investigating the flow of information to find out where it comes from? Of course, they seek to know the source of information. They try to realize it as code, as numbers and as equations tied to what they think is observable such as observed particle behavior. Here is the dilemma... 'observed behavior'. Now, we are back to square one again as what we observe is information observed by man. They may run experiments through a computer and say that man had nothing to do with the observation. But, he 'man' did. He programmed the computer, he 'man' alone analyzes the outcome.

Will we come to a point where advanced computers will observe better than we do? If that could be the case, then we would not understand their findings as we are not computers? Right? If we say that we could understand computer's observations, then essentially computers and their observations are another aspect of the same information reality which we are part of and from which our observations are based.




Based on that we would understand them; yet, in that case, we are essentially saying that they do not think or 'compute' differently than the information reality of which we are a part of as it is the information we give them. However, if we were to say that since they are faster in their computations they will arrive at different information and act on that. To agree with that, then we must agree we could not know or understand what they observe since we do not compute with the same speed. We would be thus outside their information reality.

Essentially, we could never know what they 'computer's observe. If you say we can, then computers do not have different information nor different observations. We imagine that they do and that we can understand. If you say they do based on speed of receiving information, and processing it then yes they could make other kinds of observations having greater access to information at the same time. In saying that, we would be out of the circle of knowing of that information reality since we do not compute that fast. We would have to compute as fast as they can and thus could know information in the way they know it. Otherwise, we would be outside of it. Even AI entities, would come to be above us unless they compute information at the same rate we do. Can we ever escape our own information reality? I think not... as long as we are in this lower dimension with its limited speed of information.

Looking for the Absolute in the Cosmos

If you check out the website for CERN or follow its development and projects in the news, you will likely be amazed firstly and then realize that they seek an absolute in the cosmos; one that they as a specific group of people/scientists agree upon.






If it turns out to be something else or not what they seek, its ok and must be out there yet. That is what you can hear as you listen to CERN's own youtube video on testing Supersymmetry.

As in past blogs, I have explained how science works. It has methods and procedure of course, but those which are 'man made' as in socially agreed upon and this includes their expected outcomes as well. There maybe unusual outcomes or unexpected ones and those too must be agreed upon as to what they actually are and mean. There is nothing outside the human mind in the world of man; unless, we embrace the fact that the world was created by God, the absolute and eternal Creator of the heaven and earth.

The greatest of quantum leaps in 'science' have been made by God believing scientists. For their wisdom and agreement came from the basis of there already being one true God, the Creator of all heaven and the earth. Through Him, all things we seek to understand will be made known to us. All we have to do is look at God's creation under any microscope or through any telescope in order to see His complex symmetry.

The Multi Verse In the Christian Social Imagination

Psalm 90
"...before the mountains were born or you brought forth the earth and the world, from beginning to end, you are God. You turn people back to dust, saying, "Return to dust, you mortals." For you, a thousand years are as a passing day, as brief as a few night hours. You sweep people away like dreams that disappear. They are like grass that springs up in the morning. In the morning it blooms and flourishes, but by evening it is dry and withered."

In the imagination of any creator, many things can happen and they happen this one way and in another way. Imaginations of things come and go in an eternal loop, they are both singular and many; they multiply and diminish.



The order of those imaginations do not know time, they are and yet are not. They are a verse in the mind of the creator- a multi verse of imaginations where only one thing is a constant - where there is only one given absolute - pure actuality.

In social quantum analysis, we ask - why do we seek the absolute? Is it important to know it or enough just to ask about it? It is interesting that out of analytical necessity that we must ask about it.

Aristotle accepted a prime mover. Aristotle argued that the Prime Mover is more important as a leader, as the universe depends for its existence on the Prime Mover, and he also pointed out that all things in the universe are ordered to some ‘final cause’ and ultimately to the Prime Mover

Characteristics of the Prime Mover 

The prime mover exists by necessity – so the Prime Mover could not fail to exist. The Prime mover is not capable of change, and thus is pure actuality.  The Prime Mover has a nature which is good as a lack of goodness would mean that one can do better; meaning one can change.  The Prime Mover is the Final Cause i.e. the ultimate explanation of why things exist and it is without parts and indivisible without extension; divine simplicity. ‘The final cause then, produces motion as being loved ‘is the goal of all action: this is like attraction because the prime mover is the cause of all motion. 

Is the Prime Mover the writer of multi verse?  Can we ever know the Prime Mover? Yes, and No. Yes, simply because we imagine there is one necessarily and no because though we can imagine, we cannot know who/what that is in this dimension of the multi verse.

 

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts, and your ways are not My ways.” [This is] the Lord’s declaration. “For as heaven is higher than earth, so My ways are higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.”—Isaiah 55:8–9