The Truth in the Social Reality is the Truth in the Cosmic Reality!

In a social reality, truth is only what 'humans' as in man makes it. The social reality we live in, how we understand who we are and are not and let alone how we perceive each other and in that social complexity perceive the universe, is based on the exchange of information. How much is 'truth'? That depends on what is true... doesn't it. How are we to know what is exactly true? Many scientists rely on equations, math, registers of measurement whether geological or biological and so on. But, how true are those given that man creates the means to understand equations, math and registers or does he?

Issac Newton  saw a monotheistic God as the masterful creator whose existence could not be denied in the face of the grandeur of all creation. Newton was an educated, graduated man of prestige.

What about Charles Darwin? Wouldn't or shouldn't he be superior to Newton if we are talking about truth? Darwin stated that all life was evolutionary, did he really know that? Darwin has been called and touted as a 'true' naturalist. What is true about him regarding his education is that he was not a very good student. It probably comes as a surprise to read that he neglected his medical studies and failed the Tripos which is the name for entrance exams into Cambridge and or any of the undergraduate examinations that qualify an undergraduate for a bachelor's degree there.

Also true is that Darwin infuriated his father for failing in medical studies. His father a wealthy society doctor and financier sent him to Christ's College at Cambridge to study for becoming an Anglican pastor. Something he was obviously more akin to graduating from. However, he did not graduate with any such degree. Darwin had to stay at Cambridge until June 1831. There is no record of his merit as a student nor any record of him attaining higher degrees at prestigious universities.

What is truth, is it the 'right' information exchanged and by whom would it be considered 'right'? If there are 'educated' people who spew untruth about Darwin (in the exchange of information) and make him out to be an educated graduated scientific genius of a scientifically founded doctrine called evolution then what is truth in the exchange of information and which is true information?

In our social reality, we give out information when it is convenient, when it gives us an advantage, when it makes us appear in a better light... hence, why some people 'lie' or don't give out the 'right' information. Perhaps, Darwin's social background shed a light on him that only others wanted to see in order to remain in good social circles. What is the truth in social reality? Isn't it what a number of people agree on and seems to work, or at least for those that agree and it becomes a known 'norm' as something 'information' that works even a lie.

However, Darwin had become infatuated with Paley's Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity (first published in 1802), which made an argument for divine design in nature explaining adaptation as God acting through laws of nature which of course were created by God the divine designer. Perhaps, Darwin's work was about the truth... but some have corrupted it.

What for? That is a good question. If we use a 'social' quantum analysis, we might conclude that people who know how the wave function works know that once it is observed collapses and cannot change or become anything else or different. Information works like that. Once the 'seed' of the 'false reality' is planted in the mind, it is very unlikely that people's views and opinions will be able to change. In the false reality, those people who planted the false information can control the social reality. Today, we call that propaganda.

If anything Darwin's evolution theory supports man's 'socially' created idea of race. God as the creator, we understand that race does not exist because God made all men Acts 17:25. Some can oppose this truth but can they know the truth or just propose that they know what is true? Can we ever really know about the truth? The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in Him all things were created, things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities. All things were created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together ~ Colossians 1: 15-17 .… as Newton understood the Cosmic Truth!

"He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together"..."Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." Col 1: 16, John 17:17.

It is this cosmic truth that holds the social reality truth in check ...

Life in a Program ~ Can the Creation know the Creator?

When it comes to a complex design, one would like to know the designer or at least try to understand what they were thinking, how it all came to be. Right? When looking at the beauty of a complex design, one would never conclude that it was all by chance, created on a whim, or out of chaos. Something always governs some thing, there is no such thing as no thing and nothing. Why would a random event cause creative beings that wish to understand their creation?

People say that there is no creator because we cannot see the creator. It maybe that the creator is bigger and or so much more complex than the creation, he/it is invisible to the creation or only partially visible in the creation itself.

If we take for illustration a computer game programmer, then we can better understand the above reasoning. A programmer creates not only the characters but all the environment that they exist in, objects and other characters. Do they have free will? So some extent they do, they can choose not to function as created to function. Do they understand what and where they are? Only that they are in a place and that its existence is embedded in their program from which they cannot reckon ever being detached or deleted from.

Can they ever know the creator of the program? Not in his/her entirety. It would be impossible as the creator is so much more complex, so much bigger, so outside of their created dimension. If the program is corrupted, can they be saved? Of course, the programmer saves its creation as long as its creation wants to be saved and or is not beyond corruption that it fails to accept the creator and salvation. 

Can the creation know the creator? What is to know? Only that there is a creator!

The GoldiLocks Universe We Live In!

Yes, Goldilocks as in Goldy Locks and the Three Bears. What does that have to do with the Social Imagination? Everything. The story is about human beings and how they see the world, as in imagine it.

The little girl with golden locks represents all the creation, innocent and beautiful. The three bears - God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The family of God. They leave the door open for those that are lost and seek a way back or seek to know where 'home' is.

They 'creation' try grasp at what is out there, which is just right. There is only the condition that is just right for man, for human beings because it was created that way. It just did not fall into place casually or causally by space gas which even as components of creation suggest that they were created as well.

There is no haphazardness to the universe. There is only the 'Goldilocks' universe... the one that is just right.

That is why in the social imagination, we as a group imagination, search for truths, search for identity, search for comfort, and peace in our imaginations as we desire the 'just right'. Which, God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit created for us and wants us to be reunited with.

what a quantum social analysis...

Arriving at Reality ~ The Social Quantum Delight!

Yes, it is a delight to agree on what is real and what is not real. Did you ever wonder why? And, wonder why there is so much argument or debate about what is real and what is not real. And, if what is real to us... then why is it real and who made it real to us? Is it all in our 'quantum imagination'? Probably 'yes' is the answer rather than no.

Of course, we scientists arrive at and tell us what is real and why. But, who are they? Just people who have gone through certain rigors to gain title. Don't we all make observations and contribute to what is real ... to the very thing that they get credit for describing in a university paper? Why... yes, exactly that is the case.

We do we all observe? We observe entropy, aging and or the state of decay which is all around us and includes us. To make it simple we observe the laws of thermodynamics. Could we observe anything else? That is a good question. Before, tackling that question. Let us review what the laws of thermodynamics are.

We observe that we exist is a closed system. Why not open? Because, in an open system, we could not and would not observe anything. What would be or exist to observe? You see, we are able to observe becasue we can recognize change. Change happens or what seems like change happens only in a closed system. Doesn't that seem odd. One might consider such activity to exist in a open system. Well, it all comes back to our ability to observe change, or that something is not as it was. The ability to observe happens only in a closed system. Its would be like setting a table in a room and then closing the door. If something got knocked over when no one was in there or no one was looking, it would be an open system; it means that the system is open but we cannot tell why or by whom because the it is open. Its as if the door was never closed and the wind blew in knocking something over. But, we closed the door and when we came back in, we noticed that someone or something knocked over or moved an object; thus, it is a closed system.

Yes, you can say that if no one goes in and no one notices it is open. Exactly. Once, we impose our position in the scenario, it becomes closed. Well, effectively we collapse the wave function, we close the door. 

In the first law, in the closed system, things move only when they get a push, or get agitated by other things in that system. They would not move otherwise which means their preferred state is a state of rest as we observe. In particular, it is like this: if the energy entering the system is supplied as heat and energy leaves the system as work, the heat is accounted as positive and the work is accounted as negative. We enter and observe and that is like the heat... and is positive. The results of that are work - reality.

The second law tells us that when that happens, you cannot go back, you cannot change the order. There was order and what comes through observation 'heat' and its results 'work' causes disorder. Really! Why? Because, the original state was at rest 'ordered' and then disturbed.

Its about information getting spent, used. As in the game of telephone. Where does that information go? Both positive and negative experiences in the closed system provide information, right? Yes, but for whom? Only those in the closed system. Can we stop or limit or observe differently? Perhaps... thinking of the 'glass being half full or half empty'. Is the cat dead or alive?

It seems that reality is dependent upon the observer. Yes, it does. Life is so abstract when observed as an adult and so concrete when observed as a child. Which experience is more rewarding, more exhilarating, more real? Is it because, as we age, being caught up in entropy or state of decay, we lose information. We lose that full reality of information. But, isn't information coming at us always no matter what age? Information ages as we age in this fallen world. The question man seems to be determined to answer is can we stop entropy? What they should be asking is can we live in an open system? And, how do we get there? Getting there would be delightful, wouldn't?

Yours truly ~ Dr. E.F. Gallion

Quantum Signature...Given by the Creator of it!

Fascinating is that each one of us and every living, every created thing has a quantum signature - quantum code, an identifing cosmic thread of information. Can it be reproduced by man? Not likely, though he may attempt thinking he is God. We cannot download minds, or upload our bodies with minds from a time when they were alive and think that it will be the same person. Because, there is a quantum signature for each and it cannot be reproduced by just 'man'. 

Why? Because, the quantum signature of every created thing was created by something much bigger than the creation; certainly, one can imagine a super computer an Alpha and Omega, an infinite creative entity (un-created) that is the beginning and the end. In that super knowledge,  each and every created thing is complete. Man has no such knowledge, nor can he ever have in this fallen world, this corrupted state of being - decay = entropy.

Yes, we can read about quantum digital signatures (encoded coherent states of light) used in quantum computer security programming offering a means of sending a message from one computer to another which cannot be forged or repudiated, with security verified by information-theoretical limits and quantum mechanics. 

Is that therefore suggestive of a possible means of transferring man's quantum information, man's DNA code, his quantum signature? Well, one may debate that its possible if one has all the information that man is. Of course, the physiology of man in coded form could be transferred somehow at least we imagine that as played out in Hollywood. But, what about who man is as a man in his social context, I/Me/We? That is the kind of information that tells us who a man or woman really is. 

It is that kind of information that the Creator has access to, not man. For any man to think he can know let alone upload his quantum signature without death of this flesh is mistaken and will find him/herself in the dark loop of a corrupted state of being.

All things were created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.…Colossians 1:16.


Source ~ https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0879.pdf

Godless Universe ~Really?

All scientists and theologians can do is mount their best possible arguments and try to convince each other and everyone else what caused the universe we perceive to be out there. That's right, perceive. As a sociologist, that is all man does - perceive his reality which is a social reality.

Man takes in information, processes it and through social interaction concludes what it is likely to be; but, not absolutely as man cannot know anything absolutely. Through experience, social experience in a place, man can and does perceive himself and the world round him/her and his/her place in it. We come to conclusions as to what is and what is not and what it means. Yes, meaning is everything and it usurps just about anything you or I can consider as concretely real. It means that when you or I perceive something to be real it happens only through social interaction. In that condition, what we gain in perception we also gain in meaning. When something has meaning and it does only because of social dynamics at work in social interaction, then it becomes something concrete in our mind. It has shape!

For us, the only time it changes shape is when we have additional social interactions whereby social dynamics (subordination/domination) change and we conclude different meaning and when that happens, the shape of something in our mind changes.

This is true for all human groups. That is why the shape of something even something abstract like 'freedom' has a different shape for you and different for me (if we are of different groups) and or any other person outside of one group and or from another. This is true for all things, all ideas and beliefs. Science is only agreement reality and one can say the same about having a Creator.

What we can all agree on is that both science and believers in a God Creator require information; and, that such information has an absolute point of departure 'source' or what we have to conclude which is its existence. If information is treated as real, it has a source. Man does not think of something without social interaction and in our social interaction we find who we are and are not. Why do that at all? That is the question. If we were just plants or lower life forms, we would not ask that kind of question. But, we are not such life forms. Why should we be such life forms, the kind that asks questions? If this were a world organized by itself it would not need anything higher than itself to continue its organization.

It can be argued that man is not higher than a self organizing universe and if that is the case, then man would be a mere animal... so, why does he seek to know his place in the universe? This means that the universe is much more than just a cosmos. If it were, man as we know him/her would not be necessary in such a universe asking questions.

Our perceiving can be argued as just demonstrated concerning 'perception'. But, fundamentally, information has a source. We cannot always pinpoint the source but we know it exists necessarily; otherwise we would not seek its source nor would we be able to. Which leads us to perception of God the Creator. So many ask if God created the universe then who created God.

A number of skeptics ask this question. But God by definition is the uncreated creator of the universe, so the question ‘Who created God?’ is illogical. So, a more sophisticated questioner might ask: ‘If the universe needs a cause, then why doesn’t God need a cause? And if God doesn’t need a cause, why should the universe need a cause?’ In reply, people and especially Christians should use the following reasoning:

1. Everything which has a beginning has a cause.
2. The universe has a beginning.
3. Therefore the universe has a cause.

The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning. God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn’t need a cause. Taking a look at Einstein’s general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. In that theory, we come to the understanding through perception that time along with matter and space have a beginning. Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time...therefore He doesn’t have a cause.

In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.

• 1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
• 2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.

If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy—the ‘heat death’ of the universe. For example, all radioactive atoms would have decayed, every part of the universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be possible. So the obvious corollary is that the universe began a finite time ago with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.

Now, what if the questioner accepts that the universe had a beginning, but not that it needs a cause? But it is self-evident that things that begin have a cause—no-one really denies it in his mind. Why? Because, we as created beings understand fundamentally that we were caused to be.  All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.  


As a sociologist, this is the one truth that most scientists ignore and that is if cause and effect were denied, then all information has no source and has no meaning. But, you say that man gives meaning. I am not saying he does not... but his/her idea of what something means is acquired through social interaction which has a source as Einstein said, There is no such thing as no thing."  That means that someone/thing is providing us with information. The Creator designed the program and its up and running. All we have to do is follow and be steadfast. In this way, we can be saved as in uploaded... if the program rejects the creator, then why should the creator keep it. It would likely be considered a corrupt program and be permanently deleted.

The Song of Trust in God's Provision ~ "The steadfast of mind You will keep in perfect peace, Because he trusts in You" ~ Isaiah 26:4.



'Bolded' text * Source ~http://creation.com/if-god-created-the-universe-then-who-created-god

There is no Reality Nor Quantum Reality Outside of the Creator!

Albert Einstein, who is often dishonestly characterized as having been an atheist, agreed that God-denial is foolishness. He once said of non-believers: “The fanatical atheists are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who – in their grudge against traditional religion as the ‘opium of the masses’ – cannot hear the music of the spheres.”

“I’m not an atheist,” added Einstein. “The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.” ~ An excerpt from article by Matt Barber, titled "Big Bang Blows Atheism Sky High..." - April 26, 2016.

In Romans 1:20, “For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.”


Illustrious NASA scientist (and agnostic) Dr. Robert Jastrow (1925-2008) put it this way: “For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. How? As he scaled the mountain of ignorance and was about to conquer the highest peak pulling himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”

One can see that the mountain is the same for both...a  mountain of ignorance. Both meet at the top and both thinking they made it using their know-how their knowledge. What it means is exactly what Einstein said,  “The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.” 

As Einstein also said, "there is no such thing as no thing" As the young child understands, things come from something. There is a Creator, can we understand the Creator in his entirety? No more than an ant could understand us if we picked it up and held it gently in our hand. 

The Bible tells us, those that do not have the mind of a child will not enter heaven. And he said: "Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven" ~ Matthew 18:3.

*"Therefore everyone who confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven. "But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven ~ Matthew 10:32-33. "If you declare with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved" ~ Romans 10:9.