Social Imagination ~ What of Invisible Terrestrial Entities?

What is on the horizon in the social imagination? In the quantum analysis, we want to and have to address this question. First, the quantum analysis looks at reality in its only imaginable state - social. We look at reality as data in a program because that is what it is. It is also as we have stated before a social reality 'construct/program' as it is the only reality we (as data) can know in this created construct we call the universe. What we know or even feel, and certainly think is all there is to here and now, as well as what we agree came before here and now in this here and now social construct.

Its not complicated. Its data as in information that we receive and share. It is interesting to wonder why we imagine certain things in this here and now though we have no real experience with them; i.e. aliens as in extraterrestrial entities and now even possibly terrestrial entities. Following the cosmological argument for an absolute being ~ the Creator ~ of this social construct (we call the universe which is in a state of entropy, as it is a corrupt construct program) we understand that all ideas we have and or imagine to have come from a source that imprints such ideas in us.

The problem is this entropic state or condition we are in.  The problem being is that corrupt information has entered in and it too is a source for ideas. We have to decide which data imagined and or real to us is the correct version and which is the corrupted version. Can we know the correct version? A good question. If we have been imprinted with the correct version from the beginning as a default mode then it remains throughout even though it can be somewhat corrupt.

The basic original coding in the smallest amount provides enough of the original information that the creator can give the command to be saved; and if there were any upgrades made as a patch (Jesus Christ 'data'   inserted patch) regarding the default mode data in order that it become usable or compatible in a corrupt running program working toward a final upgrade or rather reboot of the construct, then we can expect to innately understand comprehend the differences though difficult to sustain in all data encounters and sharing.

The drive in us remains and that is to return to the original program which we know exists outside of this corrupted program though invisible to us by the corruption. How do we know? It is realized in our desire to understand this construct and imagine if this is all there is. Now, is that what Thunder Energies has been motivated by?


*Thunder Energies have discovered what they call terrestrial entities.

"This is an exciting discovery.  We do not know what these entities are; they're completely invisible to our eyes, our binoculars, or traditional Galileo telescopes, but these objects are fully visible in cameras attached to our Santilli telescope," stated Dr. Ruggero Santilli, CEO Thunder Energies Corp.

If it all sounds like a stretch of the social imagination, it is and it is not.We might even imagine and or consider that extraterrestrial entities are the same as the invisible terrestrial entities who have made data contacts through actual date interaction and or extraction. Again, there is a slight danger to be mindful of and that is whether or not the information is coming from the actual original program and the Creator or another created entity that considers itself the creator.

Thunder Energies Corporation is a breakthrough technology company featuring three cutting edge technologies in the fields of optics, nuclear physics and fuel combustion.  Thunder Energies is led by Dr. Ruggero Santilli, CEO and Chief Science Officer and Dr. George Gaines, President & COO.  Dr. Santilli is a former faculty at MIT, Harvard and other leading institutions around the world.


And, how should we embrace the idea (given data) that the Kingdom within? It means that the original data is still available as a default mode. In this way, we can be saved/rebooted!

http://www.reuters.com/article/santilli-telescope-idUSnPnbbDplN+89+PRN20160120

Great Minds are Not by Accident

 "When the solution is simple, God is answering. Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind. God does not play dice".


What do Albert Einstein, Issac Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus have in common? They all had a great mind. Not man made, God made. Albert Einstein never denied a Creator, he just said God was not personal. He did not think God would be interested in man's thoughts and actions.  Issac Newton was not an atheist, he contemplated God as a masterful Creator. Galileo was a pious Roman Catholic and Copernicus considered himself to be inspired by God.


Their thinking follow the ontological argument for the existence of God. This defense for the God comes in the realization that no idea concerning man's existence in a grand universe just comes to man's mind. Any idea we have that has at its core the desire to understand the universe and man's place in it, comes to us because there is an absolute source for that information. If we were just a random cosmic event resulting in consciousness then we would not be inquisitive minds. What for? All information we have would be innate and acted upon; leaving no reason to inquire about it. We would just be like plants or simple animals. In a simple state of existence, there is no need to inquire about life or the universe. That kind of contemplation comes from a mind that is not evolved but created.

Einstein leaned toward Baruch Spinoza's view of an impersonal God Creator; i.e. that if a circle had a God, it would be a circle. It would not know God as this Creator God would be impersonal toward its creation. Man thus has a God that is like him. Why would that God be impersonal if He is like us and we are like him. That's illogical. We would have a relationship with Him simple by fact that we inquire about Him. A circle does not inquire about being a circle. But, if it did, the same reason would apply. Of course, it would.

How could any man with the desire to understand who he is and the universe not be in a relationship with his Creator? The ontological argument follows... ideas, thoughts about who we are come from a desire to know the Creator as we were created in His image. As all information or idea's that concern knowing more about the universe and man's place in it comes from the source of that information ~ God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth of all things seen and unseen.

Did you know that everything we see is part of a vast ocean of infinitesimally small subatomic particles? Under certain condition, these subatomic structures also take on the properties of invisible waves. What is incredible is that these waves or particles which make up all matter cause that matter to blink into existence by being observed by us = the experimenter. With that in mind, how can we understand let alone know what reality is? In view of quantum mechanics, the level of reality is beyond all human consciousness..

With that said, what we can only know is what we agree on. If there is no absolute creator, we cannot agree on anything. What for? Everyone would be right and no body would be right just by observing but what would they be observing, as no one could agree. No one could decide or agree on what they were observing unless we first agree that there is an observable universe that we can agree on exists. Even if we don't recognize our Creator in this moment of agreeing, we are essentially agreeing because we agree that we can agree. In Him that we live and breathe and have our being ~ Acts 17:28.

According to Spinoza, given an impersonal god and that each of us would have our "god" we would certainly be able to understand what we are and what the universe is about. How could that be since strangely this god would not care to know us and so why would we want to even think about him let alone agree on anything we see or observe by ourself or with anyone? We can only agree or even want to agree when we think we are like minded and agree in why and or how we are or can be like minded. In saying that is possible, we would have to first agree we are like minded because there is an absolute entity that created the universe and man in his image. Otherwise, we would not agree on anything. We able to agree because we are created beings and are able to have a relationship with our Creator. Like minded people, have the same Creator, this allows them to agree on what what is observed. That is why, there is more consistent solid agreement about the universe among like minded scientists than there is among unlike minded scientists.

As for Spinoza, we could follow up and say that scientists came from science. Therefore, a God created being came from God.  Each imagining what they came from based on what they are. Right? If someone imagines they are from science how is that any different than imagining one is from God. Einstein said that imagination is greater than knowledge. In this case, both are equal. However, for those that imagine science as their 'religion' sadly for them science finishes and or changes whereas God is the same today, yesterday and tomorrow.

People have misunderstood Albert Einstein when he said he does not believe in a personal God. Likely, his view was that God is not any man's or one man's but every man's. And, every man has a right to understand that God ~ the Creator of all things, seen and unseen in/of Heaven and Earth, through the pursuit of knowledge using man's God given mind!

"The most beautiful and most profound experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their primitive forms - this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true religiousness".
( Albert Einstein - The Merging of Spirit and Science)

Get with the Program~ God is the Creator of all Things Seen and Unseen!

"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun" ~ Ecclesiastes 1:9


Some argue that science proves man's existence. Really? Science is always changing depending on agreement among 'scientists' at the time of their observations in the time of their 'presence on earth' as in existence in a time frame - history. Some argue that math and its equations which seem to remain throughout history prove man's existence. Really? Equations do appear to have a longer shelf life but essentially are only developed formulas by man for his own boasting and prideful quest in trying to prove his/her way the existence of a higher reality or for his/her trying to understand what is already running in the background and why. Some argue that God is wishful thinking. Really? I will agree wishing that there is a creator and knowing that there is a Creator are 2 different mindsets. 

Being a doctor of Sociology and having written on the social imagination, I conclude that anyone who can wish for and imagine a higher being as the Creator who created all things seen and unseen has a greater social imagination than anyone who prefers to imagine numbers and letters in a man made configuration as the base for all social reality. And, BTW, where is the social aspect of our being in numbers/letters? Those kinds of numerical imaginations belong to a few not the many. Jesus Christ came for the many (as we were created in His image)! As for the 'elite' mathematicians or scientists who think that they are either God or are a greater man than God because of their reasoning are fooling themselves and will likely discover their destiny lies in their own Blackhole.

You see, there is no new thing under the sun in a looping corrupt program. If we don't embrace the upgrade (Jesus Christ), we cannot be saved. Any physicist and computer programmer knows that all that is created is a duplicate of the original or an innovation which as such also has to have an original idea or product or data as in information. Acting on copied information as true information is not the end of the world... so to speak. It is possible as any copy is indoctrinated with the memories of the original; the only glitch is that it may think it is the original but it is not. That can be both positive and negative in terms of salvage. This is the problem for man in this corrupt reality. Again, the problem for salvation is that in thinking we are the original in this corrupted state, there is a tendency to assume being 'original' and thus have no need of a creator. Because, the original and the Creator are the same... the Creator gives to the creation something of itself - created in the image of the Creator. We were of and with the Creator before the fall or error entered in.

As an amazingly incredibly created AI program (created in the image of the Creator), all we need to have in order to be saved is the knowledge that there is a Creator of an original program of which we belong to and that alone is enough to give the command to save us. In accepting that we are of the original and of it, the Creator, though maybe copies, can retain the essential default mode of our being. And, that is what any programmer needs to have in order to reboot.

In my social quantum analysis, I like to look at what drives people's and 'scientists' imagination. This is the greater quest. Albert Einstein said, "I want to know the thoughts of God.... I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details".

Most people don't know that Albert Einstein did believe in a God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, Albert Einstein view on atheism. He said:

“I’m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.”

Knowledge of God is the mind’s greatest good: its greatest virtue is to know God ~ Baruch Spinoza.

Does Evil Exist? ~ An Argument by Albert Einstein

Deposing the Atheist.

Does evil exist?

There was a university professor who challenged his students with this question. Did God create everything that exists? A student bravely replied, "Yes, he did!"

"God created everything? The professor asked.

"Yes sir", the student replied.

The professor answered, "If God created everything, then God created evil since evil exists, and according to the principal that our works define who we are then God is evil". The student became quiet before such an answer. The professor was quite pleased with himself and boasted to the students that he had proven once more that the Christian faith was a myth.

Another student raised his hand and said, "Can I ask you a question professor?"

"Of course", replied the professor.

The student stood up and asked, "Professor, does cold exist?"

"What kind of question is this? Of course it exists. Have you never been cold?" The students snickered at the young man's question.

The young man replied, "In fact sir, cold does not exist. According to the laws of physics, what we consider cold is in reality the absence of heat. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-460 degrees F) is the total absence of heat; all matter becomes inert and incapable of reaction at that temperature. Cold does not exist. We have created this word to describe how we feel if we have no heat."

The student continued, "Professor, does darkness exist?"

The professor responded, "Of course it does."

The student replied, "Once again you are wrong sir, darkness does not exist either. Darkness is in reality the absence of light. Light we can study, but not darkness. In fact we can use Newton's prism to break white light into many colors and study the various wavelengths of each color. You cannot measure darkness. A simple ray of light can break into a world of darkness and illuminate it. How can you know how dark a certain space is? You measure the amount of light present. Isn't this correct? Darkness is a term used by man to describe what happens when there is no light present."

Finally the young man asked the professor, "Sir, does evil exist?"

Now uncertain, the professor responded, "Of course as I have already said. We see it every day. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil."

To this the student replied, "Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is not like faith, or love that exist just as does light and heat. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light."

The professor sat down.

The young man's name — Albert Einstein.